Next: Theoretical Approach Up: Main Previous: Glossary

1. Introduction

In the concrete industry, workability is defined as "the ease and homogeneity for which the concrete or
mortar can be placed, consolidated and finished" [3].  Ideally, concrete workability should be characterized by its rheological properties, thus establishing a materials science basis. These properties are usually defined as the Bingham parameters: yield stress and plastic viscosity [4]. It has been shown that the most common workability test used, the slump cone test (ASTM C443) [5], correlates well only with the yield stress [6]. There are no standard tests of fresh concrete that relate directly to the plastic viscosity. Hence, the workability of concrete is not completely measured or specified by current standard tests.

In response to this fact, at least five concrete rheometers have been designed to measure both the yield stress and plastic viscosity of concrete. These rheometers were compared in 2000 during a round-robin test [1]. It was found that although good empirical correlations could be found between the rheometers, the absolute values of the rheological parameters depended on the instrument used. As a result, the concrete industry is unable to specify workability in terms of rheological properties, because the plastic viscosity cannot be easily and uniquely measured. Therefore, a different approach to compare the results from various rheometers has become necessary.

The new approach presented here uses the relative plastic viscosity instead of the plastic viscosity. The relative plastic viscosity of a suspension is defined as the ratio of the plastic viscosity of the whole suspension to the plastic viscosity of the embedding fluid matrix or medium. In concrete, the embedding matrix can be defined as the mortar, while in mortar the matrix would the cement paste. The inclusions or particles in the suspension are the coarse aggregates in concrete or the sand in mortar. Therefore, the relative plastic viscosity a concrete is the plastic viscosity of the concrete divided by the plastic viscosity of the mortar. It is assumed that the mortar used to determine the plastic viscosity of the matrix has the same composition as the mortar in the concrete. The relative plastic viscosity is function of the concentration of the particles and their shape. Thus, for a given concrete, a plot could be prepared comparing the relative plastic viscosity and the coarse aggregate concentration. It will be shown that the relative plastic viscosity does not depend on the rotational rheometer used. If all data can really be plotted on the same curve using the relative plastic viscosity, it would allow direct comparisons of the data from all rheometers, which until now has not been possible.

In this study, the relative plastic viscosities of several concrete mixes were determined by using computer simulation, two different concrete rheometers, and a parallel plate cement paste/mortar rheometer. By plotting all the data on a graph of the relative plastic viscosity versus the concentration of particles (i.e., coarse aggregates), it can be shown that the main influence on the relative plastic viscosity is the aggregate concentration (although other factors such as shape could play a role). The data set used in this paper is small, therefore our observation should be confirmed with further testing.  A second round-robin test comparing concrete rheometers is being planned by American Concrete Institute (ACI) committee 236A in 2003. The results will be used to further improve this method.


Next: Theoretical Approach Up: Main Previous: Glossary