Next: Estimation of the Fundamental
Up:
Main
Previous: Experimental
Procedure
The modified slump test as described was performed on all of the mixtures and the partial slump times (which will hereafter be called the slump times) are given by (Ferraris et al. 1997 [6] ). After the mortars and concretes for which the final slump was less than 100 mm are excluded, the measured times range between 0.63 and 15.97 s.
One question was to find out if the minimum time was controlled by the
slump of the
concrete or whether, the disk separated from the concrete during the fall.
The
theoretical drop time of a body subject to gravity to fall a distance h of 100
mm is
, or 0.14 seconds. Two measurements of this
time (without concrete) gave values of 0.16 and 0.15 seconds. Hence, it
was concluded
that any separation is unlikely (at least with the concretes tested). In
addition, the
precision of measurement is on the order of 1/10 of a second due to the
reaction times of
the operator. Also, the precision reflects the fact that the cone lifting is
not precisely
controlled (Bartos 1992 [1] ).
The coherence of the measurements was examined by examining the variation in slump time within each mixture group. With rare exceptions, the times are arranged very well as a function of the volume of water: they decrease regularly as the water dosage increases. On the other hand, comparison of the average values of series of measurements is equally instructive and encouraging. The slump times of all mixtures without the HWRA average 1.51 seconds (range ± 0.54 seconds), while the values for all mixtures with HWRA are generally greater and more widely spread (average of 4.80 seconds, range of ± 4.66 seconds). Therefore, this test will be more useful in determining the plastic viscosities of concretes containing HWRA.
A check was done to determine whether the modification to the standard slump test affected the final slump measurement. This was necessary to have complete compatibility with the unmodified test.
The mass of the disk (212 g) increases the vertical stress on the sample
by a maximum value equal to its weight divided by the upper area of the
frustum, this was 0.27 kPa. When the disk reaches the stop, the height,
h, of the concrete is 200 mm. Hence, the vertical compression stress
at the base of the sample equals
gh (where
=
2400 kg/m3 is the density of the fresh concrete and g
is the acceleration due to gravity), that is, about 4.8 kPa. Thus it is seen
that the vertical stress due to the disk is at most on the order of 6% of the
stress due to the concrete. Moreover, the friction of the concrete along the
rod would tend to reduce the final slump. To verify that these effects are
negligible, a comparative study was done with six compositions chosen
because they are representative of the range of slumps obtained. The two
tests are representative of the range of slumps obtained. The two tests
(the standard slump test and the modified test) were conducted in parallel.
Figure 5 shows the comparison between the two tests.
The best fit line passing throug the origin has a slope of 1.01 ± 0.03.
This regression leads to a standard deviation of 17 mm.
Therefore,
the slumps measured with the two tests can be considered identical.
