The LB method of modeling fluid dynamics is actually a
family [3] of models
with varying degrees of faithfulness to the properties of real liquids.
These methods are currently in a state of evolution as the models become
better understood and are corrected for various deficiencies.
The approach of LB is to consider a typical volume element of fluid
to be composed of a collection of particles that are represented in terms
of a particle velocity distribution function at each point in space.
The particle velocity distribution,
, is the number density of
particles at node x, time t, with velocity,
ea, where (a=1,...,b) indicates the velocity
direction and superscript i labels the fluid component.
The time is counted in discrete time steps, and the fluid particles
can collide with each other as they move under applied forces.
For this paper
we use the D3Q19 (3 Dimensional lattice with b=19) lattice
[4, 5].
The microscopic velocity, ea, equals all permutations of
(±1, ±1, 0) for
1
a
12, (± 1, 0, 0) for 13
,
a
18, and
(0, 0, 0) for a = 19.
The units of ea are the lattice constant divided by the time
step. Macroscopic quantities such as the density,
ni(x,t),
and the fluid velocity, ui,
of each fluid component, i, are
obtained by taking suitable moment sums of
.
Note that while
the velocity distribution function is defined only over a discrete set
of velocities,
the actual macroscopic velocity field of the fluid is continuous.
The time evolution of the particle velocity distribution function
satisfies the following LB equation:
where
is the equilibrium distribution at
and
is the relaxation time that controls the rate
of approach to equilibrium.
The equilibrium distribution can be represented in the following form for
particles of each type [5,
8]:
S is the number of fluid component, m,i is the molecular
mass of the ith component,
ta = 1/36 for 1
a
12, ta = 1/18 for 13
a
18 and t19
= 1/3.
The free parameter do can be related to an effective temperature, T, for
the system by the following moment of the equilibrium distribution:
which results in T=(1-do)/2 (we take units such that the Boltzmann constant kb)=1).
The above formalism leads to a velocity field that is a solution
of the Navier-Stokes [7] equation with
the kinematic viscosity,
where ci is the concentration of each component
[8].
There are a variety of approaches to modeling the phase separation of fluids
[3, 9].
In the Shan-Chen model, a force,
,
between the two fluids is introduced that effectively
perturbs the equilibrium velocity [4,
5] for
each fluid so that they have a tendency to phase separate:
| (7) |
where
is the new velocity used in Eqs.
[3] and [4].
A simple forcing that depends on the density of each fluid,
is as follows [4,
5]:
with
for
;
for
; and
for
.
is a constant that controls the strength of the interaction.
Clearly, the forcing term is related to the density gradient of the
fluid.
It has been shown that the above forcing term can drive the
phase separation process and naturally produce an interfacial surface tension effect consistent
with the Laplace law boundary condition [5].
Phase separation of fluid can also be modeled by directly incorporating the force,
, into the body force term.
First note that in the continuum Boltzmann equation, the body force term is written
,
where
is an acceleration field due to a body force.
A representation [10] of this body force term
to second order in
Hermite polynomials, in the discrete velocity space of the D3Q19 lattice is
| (9) |
To first order, the body force term is written
as
.
In both models, phase separation takes place when the mutual diffusivity
of the binary mixture becomes negative. An analytical expression for the
mutual diffusivity has been determined in a previous work
[8].
For the case of a critical composition, the condition for the system studied
to undergo phase separation is
.