Next: Experimental Up:
Main Previous: Main
Introduction
Fire resistive materials (FRMs) have been utilized for many years
[1] to
protect steel (and other) substrates during a fire exposure, by limiting or
reducing the temperature rise experienced by the steel. While it is obvious that the thermophysical
properties, mainly thermal conductivity, heat capacity, density, and heats of
reactions and phase changes, of the FRMs will control their performance in this
application [2], few standard
test methods are readily available for actually measuring these properties over
the wide temperature range of relevance during an actual fire exposure (from
room temperature to greater than 1000 ºC, for
instance). Most evaluations of these
materials are currently performed on a pass/fail basis using the American
Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests
of Building Construction and Materials (E 119) [3], which provide a time-based performance rating
(e.g., 1 h, 2 h, or 3 h, etc.). While
these ratings are used daily by architects and designers for selecting passive
fire protection strategies, they provide little direct information of value for
engineers and scientists who are interested in simulating the fire/structural
performance of buildings and other structures. While some twenty years ago, Wickstrom [4] first detailed how the thermal resistance of FRMs
could be obtained from fire tests where furnace and steel temperatures were
recorded, such computations are still rarely employed in the United States. The objective of this paper is to present a
methodology for estimating the room temperature heat capacity
and temperature variable thermal conductivity of FRMs by combining two existing
experimental techniques, namely the transient plane source method
[5; 6] and a recently developed slug calorimeter
technique [7]. In
addition to providing estimates of these critical thermal properties, the
presented protocol also provides supplemental information on the effects of
chemical reactions, phase changes, and mass transport of reaction gases on the
thermal performance of the FRMs being evaluated.