Next: Variability of Computer Simulation
Up: Main
Previous: Graphs for Fit of
Figure 22:
Measured and model degree of hydration vs. time for Cement
115 with w/c=0.30.
 |
Figure 23:
Measured and model chemical shrinkage vs. time for Cement 115
with w/c=0.30.
 |
Figure 24:
Measured and model degree of hydration vs. time for Cement
115 with w/c=0.40.
 |
Figure 25:
Measured and model chemical shrinkage vs. time for Cement 115
with w/c=0.40.
 |
Figure 26:
Measured and model heat release vs. time for Cement 115
with w/c=0.40.
 |
Figure 27:
Measured and model heat release vs. time for Cement 115
with w/c=0.45.
 |
Figure 28:
Measured and model degree of hydration vs. time for Cement
115 with w/c=0.45.
 |
Figure 29:
Measured and model chemical shrinkage vs. time for Cement 115
with w/c=0.45.
 |
Figure 30:
Measured and model degree of hydration vs. time for Cement
116 with w/c=0.30.
 |
Figure 31:
Measured and model chemical shrinkage vs. time for Cement 116
with w/c=0.30.
 |
Figure 32:
Measured and model degree of hydration vs. time for Cement
116 with w/c=0.40.
 |
Figure 33:
Measured and model chemical shrinkage vs. time for Cement 116
with w/c=0.40.
 |
Figure 34:
Measured and model heat release vs. time for Cement 116
with w/c=0.40.
 |
Figure 35:
Measured and model heat release vs. time for Cement 116
with w/c=0.45.
 |
Figure 36:
Measured and model degree of hydration vs. time for Cement
116 with w/c=0.45.
 |
Figure 37:
Measured and model chemical shrinkage vs. time for Cement 116
with w/c=0.45.
 |
Figure 38:
Measured and model degree of hydration vs. time for Cement
115 with w/c=0.40 for monophase Bogue representation.
 |
Figure 39:
Measured and model chemical shrinkage vs. time for Cement 115
with w/c=0.40 for monophase Bogue representation.
 |
Figure 40:
Measured and model heat release vs. time for Cement 115
with w/c=0.40 for monophase Bogue representation.
 |
Figure 41:
Measured and model degree of hydration vs. time for Cement
116 with w/c=0.40 for monophase Bogue representation.
 |
Figure 42:
Measured and model chemical shrinkage vs. time for Cement 116
with w/c=0.40 for monophase Bogue representation.
 |
Figure 43:
Measured and model heat release vs. time for Cement 116
with w/c=0.40 for monophase Bogue representation.
 |
Next: Variability of Computer Simulation
Up: Main
Previous: Graphs for Fit of