Next: Example Results
Up: Main
Previous: Cellular Automaton Simulations.
5. Relevant Experimental Techniques
Heat of Hydration
The heat of hydration of a cement can be assessed in a variety of ways:
adiabatic or semi-adiabatic calorimetry, isothermal calorimetry, or using
heat of solution techniques as indicated in the
bibliographic
database
on this subject. At NIST, heat of hydration is generally determined using
isothermal calorimetry in a multi-chambered microcalorimeter constructed
at NIST
[31].
A known mass of cement, along with several small stainless steel balls to
facilitate mixing, are placed in a sealed calorimetric cell which is then
equilibrated in the main calorimeter chamber. After a steady heat flux signal
is obtained, the cell is removed, the appropriate mass of water (also thermally
equilibrated to the calorimeter temperature) is quickly added using a syringe,
and hand mixing performed (by shaking the cell) before restoring the cell to
the calorimeter chamber. The voltage signals produced (proportional to heat
flux) by the calorimeter cells are digitized using a PC-based high resolution
A/D data acquisition system. Thus, during the initial hydration, data can be
taken at 30 second intervals. Once the reactions slow down, data is typically
acquired every 5 to 10 minutes over a period of about 7 days. At longer times,
the signal of the calorimeter is very close to its background level, so that
detection of the slow but ongoing hydration by heat release becomes
unreliable.
In analyzing the heat release data, the initial exothermic "mixing" peak is
ignored due to the necessity of removing the sample cell from the calorimeter
chamber to assure adequate mixing. This could result in a difference in the
cumulative heat released over a period of 7 days on the order of 10 kJ/kg or
about 4%, as estimated from samples mixed in situ in the calorimeter. Due
to mixing difficulties at low w/c ratios, calorimeter data is generally
only acquired for specimens with w/c > 0.4.
Chemical Shrinkage
Chemical shrinkage, the volume reduction associated with the reaction between
cement and water in hydrating cement paste, was first measured by Powers
in 1935
[32].
Conventionally, this property can be measured using the technique described by
Geiker
[33],
and more recently employed by Tazawa et al.
[34].
Typically, to assess chemical shrinkage, a known mass of cement paste (on the
order of 10 g) is placed in the bottom of a small glass jar (diameter of 2.5 cm
and height of about 6 cm). After covering the cement paste with about 1 mL of
water, the remainder of the jar is filled with an hydraulic oil. The jar is
then sealed with a rubber stopper encasing a pipette graduated in 0.01 mL
increments. The jar is then placed in a constant temperature water bath
and the oil level monitored to the nearest 0.0025 mL over time. A control
sample using only cement powder and oil (no water) is used to correct for minor
room temperature fluctuations. By normalizing the change in volume by the mass
of cement in the sample, the chemical shrinkage per gram of initial cement
(mL/g cement) can be determined. Based on the estimated uncertainty of the
mass (0.02 g) and volume (0.00072 mL) measurements, the maximum expanded
uncertainty in the calculated chemical shrinkage is estimated to be 0.001
mL/g cement, assuming a coverage factor of 2
[35].
Typically, two replicates are run for each w/c ratio and cement of interest.
Next: Example Results
Up: Main
Previous: Cellular Automaton Simulations.