In this section, we first derive an equation for determining the replacement level needed to ensure adequate water for "complete" curing of the concrete. In this case, complete curing means that the cement reaches the maximum degree of hydration that is possible, given the space limitations for forming hydration products in low w/c ratio systems. Then, we proceed to briefly describe the microstructural model of concrete which will be used to determine the relative proximity of the paste to the water sources (the LWFA surfaces).
The volume of water per cubic meter of concrete needed to be supplied by the
LWFA depends on the mixture proportions of the concrete in the following
manner. Let CS denote the chemical shrinkage occurring during the
hydration of the cement; typically, this value is on the order of 0.06
kg H2O per kg cement hydrated [7,8]. The amount of needed
water will depend on this quantity, as well as the cement content, Cf in kg
cement/m3 concrete, and the w/c ratio for the mixture proportions.
For w/c
ratios below 0.40 (typical of a HPC), complete hydration can not be achieved
and the maximum degree of hydration,
max,
can be estimated as
(w/c)/0.40. Then, the volume of water, Vwat,
that is "consumed"
during hydration due to chemical shrinkage is given by:
is the density of water (1000 kg/m3). Denoting the porosity
of the LWFA by
LWFA
and its saturation (0-1) by S, the
total volume fraction of LWFA needed, VLWFA, is
given by:
For example, consider a typical HPC mixture with the following characteristics:
cement content of 500 kg/m3, w/c=0.3, and fine aggregate volume
fraction of 0.30. For w/c=0.3, the maximum potential degree of hydration is
0.75. Substituting all the appropriate values into equation 1,
0.0225 m3 water/m3 concrete are needed to ensure that the capillary
porosity in the cement paste is water-filled at the maximum degree of
hydration. Assuming a porosity of the LWFA of 0.15 and complete saturation
(S=1.0), one calculates VLWFA to be 0.15, so that 50 % of the fine
aggregate (on a volume basis) needs to be replaced by saturated LWFA.
In addition to providing the necessary volume of water, a further issue
to be addressed is the proximity of the cement paste requiring the water to
the surfaces of the LWFA. Conceptually, this is similar to the "protected
paste volume concept" for air entrained concrete
[9,10,11], where one is interested in the volume of
cement paste within a given distance of an air void surface. For our
purposes, this question can be addressed using a previously developed 3-D
continuum microstructural model of concrete [12]. In this model, the
aggregates are represented by impenetrable spherical or ellipsoidal particles
and each aggregate particle is surrounded by a soft penetrable shell
representing the interfacial transition zone. For the current study, we are
not specifically interested in the interfacial transition zones, but instead
adapt the code to surround only the saturated LWFA particles with a shell of
variable thickness. Then, by systematic point sampling [12], we can
determine the volume fraction of paste contained within these shells and hence
the relative proximity of the cement paste to the additional water sources.
It should also be
noted that analytical equations exist [6,13,14] for estimating
these paste volume fractions directly from the aggregate particle size
distribution. The complete equations for doing this have been provided in
[13], based on the original development of Lu and Torquato in
[6]. Application of these equations to the case of partial replacement
of the fine aggregate by LWFA considers only two components of the system: the
cement paste with volume fraction Vpaste, and the saturated LWFA.
Therefore, we correct the LWFA volume fraction used in the analytical
equations by dividing it by the sum (
VLWFA+Vpaste), thereby keeping
the ratio
VLWFA/Vpaste the same for both the measured system and the
analytical calculation. These equations will thus only provide approximate
values of the cement paste fraction within a given distance of a LWFA surface,
as they effectively ignore the probability that a point within a given
distance from the aggregate surface could lie within a normal weight
aggregate, as well as within the cement paste. This approximation will worsen
as more of the normal weight aggregates are of the same size as the LWFA.
Here, the accuracy of this approximation will be evaluated quantitatively for
the two systems (described below) considered in this study.
In this preliminary study, two aggregate gradations were investigated based
on the limits of the ASTM C 33 [15] aggregate specification. In both
cases, the coarse aggregate particle size distribution (PSD) followed the
coarse limit curve for a nominal size range of 12.5 mm to 4.75 mm (maximum
aggregate size of 19.0 mm) and a coarse to fine aggregate volume ratio of 1.5:1
was assumed. For the first study, the fine aggregate PSD followed the
coarse limit of the ASTM C 33 specification and a volume fraction of aggregate
(Vagg) of 0.75 was used. In the second case, the fine limit of the
ASTM C 33 fine aggregate specification was used. In the latter case, because
of the higher surface area of the aggregate (nearly twice that of the first
case), the volume fraction of aggregate was reduced to 70 %. Because of the
fineness of the aggregate, over one million aggregate particles were needed to
simulate a 3-D model concrete 30 mm on a side (27,000 mm3 in volume). In
both cases, replacement of 25 %, 50 %, and 100 % of the normal weight fine
aggregate by its saturated LWFA counterpart on a volume basis was simulated by
randomly assigning the desired proportion of the fine aggregate to be
lightweight during the aggregate placement process. The fraction of the
cement paste within a given distance of the LWFA surfaces was then determined
for the two distributions for each of the following distances: (10, 20, 30, 40,
80, 100, 150, and 200)
µm. As the capillary pore space in the cement
paste depercolates during curing, the water transport will be effectively
limited to distances on the order of 100 µm
to 200 µm
[8,16].