The basic geometrical configurations for concrete pavements and bridge decks considered in this study are shown in Figure 1. For a pavement, the concrete thickness is considered to be 0.2 m, with a 0.2 m thick layer of soil (subbase) immediately beneath it. For the bridge deck, both surfaces of the concrete are assumed to be exposed to the environment, which is generally the case when temporary wooden forms are used [6,7]. While often the bottom surface is protected from the environment by steel forms which remain in place [6,7], the thickness of these forms (20 gauge or 0.9 mm) is such that their contribution to heat transfer should be minimal. For the bridge decks, it is further assumed that the convection coefficient for heat transfer is the same for both the top and bottom surfaces, and that no heat transfer by radiation (incoming sunlight or emitted radiation) occurs at the bottom surface. For the pavements, it is further assumed that at a depth of 0.2 m, the soil temperature is constant at a value of 13 ºC. (Variation of this soil temperature did not significantly influence the model results in this study).
Figure 1: Basic configurations of one-dimensional heat transfer model for concrete pavements and bridge decks.
Both systems shown in Figure 1 are modelled using a
one-dimensional finite difference grid with a spatial resolution
of 20 mm (e.g., ten nodes within the concrete). At the top surface,
four modes of heat transfer are considered: conduction into the
concrete, convection, solar absorption, and grey-body irradiation to the
surroundings. Specifically, the heat flow contribution (in
)
due to conduction is given by:
where Tambient is the
ambient temperature and hconv is
the convection coefficient in
.
While several empirical relationships to estimate convection
coefficients are available in the literature [2], for this study,
the convection coefficient was calculated based on the
wind speed available in the weather data files and the following
equations used in the commercially available FEMMASSE system [8]:
For radiative heat transfer at the top concrete surface, two contributions
are considered. The first is the radiation absorbed from the incoming
sunlight. A simple equation for the incoming heat flow due to this
source is given by [2]:
where Qinc is the incident solar radiation (W/m2 ) and γ abs is the solar absorptivity of the concrete. For this study, the incident solar radiation was taken directly from the weather data files [5], while a value of 0.65 was used for the solar absorptivity [8]. Second, one must consider the emission of radiation from the "warm" concrete to the night sky. This heat flow can be estimated as:
where σ is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant (5.669 x 10-8
W/(m2 ºC4)), ε is the emissivity of the concrete,
T0K is the concrete surface temperature (in K), and Tsky
is the calculated sky temperature also in K. For this study, a value
of 0.9 was used for the concrete emissivity [2,8,9].
The sky temperature was estimated based on an algorithm presented
by Walton [10] using the following series of equations:
The above equations are employed in a general finite difference
solution to one-dimensional heat transfer [4]. The time
step in the finite difference scheme is established based on
the layer thickness (20 mm) and the thermal properties of the materials,
to ensure numerical convergence of the solution [4]. The
ambient environmental conditions at any specific time are calculated by
linear interpolation of the hourly values available from the weather files.